FRIDAY 3/24🇺🇸

sashayed:

sashayed:

GOOD MORNING chiclets. As you may have heard, today Congressional Republicans will try to ram through their irresponsible slapdash garbage “healthcare” bill, which will make it even more difficult for poor people to afford getting sick, but on the bright side*, will BIGLY cut taxes for people making over $200k!!! (*I’m being sarcastic. This is not a bright side.)

Fun fact: A 64-year-old making $26,500 would be responsible for $14,600 in premiums under the proposed Republican “American Health Care Act.” Under the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), the same person would pay $1,700. Haha.

So guess what! This is a good morning to take two minutes to call your representative to register your opposition to this toxic nonsense bill and affirm your support for your friends, neighbors and countrypeople on Obamacare. The Indivisible Guide has some great scripts with sample dialogue depending on your rep’s stated position. You could also just take the paragraph approach:

Hi, my name is [your name] and I’m a constituent from [your town]. I’m calling to register my opposition to repealing the ACA and replacing it with this slapdash Republican health care bill, which will strip millions of people of lifesaving coverage. The ACA is important to me personally because [I am on Obamacare, I have family/friends/neighbors/students/patients/coworkers on Obamacare; a short personal anecdote is always effective]. 

If Congress[wo]man [Rep’s name] votes in favor of this bill, it will be a disaster for American healthcare and her/his constituents will remember that in the next election. Could you pass that on to the Congress[wo]man? [wait for them to say yes.] Thanks for your time. 

Here’s me and my roommate calling our congressman.

image

see? its so easy even this idiot can do it. great job everybody. way to save america.

1. YOU DID IT, 2. Is there any sweeter phrase in the English language than “humiliating defeat for President Trump?” I can’t think of one. 

one of the lessons i learned from captain america:

helah:

adeterminedloser:

jumpingjacktrash:

sometimes you fight, not because you think you can win, but because you need to be able to look back later and say, “i fought.”

“In King Lear (III:vii) there is a man who is such a minor
character that Shakespeare has not given him even a name: he is merely
“First Servant.” All the characters around him – Regan, Cornwall, and
Edmund – have fine long-term plans. They think they know how the story
is going to end, and they are quite wrong. The servant has no such
delusions. He has no notion of how the play is going to go. But he
understands the present scene. He sees an abomination (the blinding of
old Gloucester) taking place. He will not stand it.

His sword is out and pointed at his master’s breast in a
moment: then Regan stabs him dead from behind. That is his whole part:
eight lines all told. But if it were real life and not a play, that is
the part it would be best to have acted.”

– C.S. Lewis, “The World’s Last Night”

So Stanford professor Ken Taylor has a whole lecture on this in Hamlet, and the role of defiant resignation (citing Kierkegaard’s concept of resignation) where you are urged to act despite understanding that it won’t change anything, simply to demonstrate your dissatisfaction with the world as it stands, and your belief in what it should be. But Steve demonstrates a lot of this.

As thousands blockade airports and fill up city streets, a new generation of amateur Kremlinologists is coming forward with its hastily assembled theories, assembled from bureaucratic signifiers, to say that by trying to stop the harm he’s actually doing, all we’ve done is play into his tiny, tiny hands. […] What looks like the beginnings of a breakdown in effective government, or an opportunity, is nothing of the sort. They planned everything, and everything fell into place.

The left is no stranger to this kind of defeatism, and it’s not hard to see why. Capitalism is omnivorous and polymorphously perverse; today’s revolutionary slogans are found on tomorrow’s Coke cans. […] If you look backward from the state of the world today at all the heroic resistance movements that have failed throughout history, it’s easy to think that this was all part of the plan.

Much of this is true, but its effects can be paralyzing. We’ve fucked up so much that it’s made us afraid of victory; faced with an enormous and implacable enemy, there are people who are now convinced that its power is infinite. Whenever it looks like the reactionaries have massively over-reached themselves it’s just part of a larger plan, one that we can’t see. If Steve Bannon’s pants fell down tomorrow and he tottered crying into a muddy pond, there would be someone ready to announce that actually, this made him even more omnipotent than he was before.

[…] It’s almost comforting, in a way, to imagine yourself as a pawn. There’s no moral duty involved: The evil plan is grand and inscrutable; it gives a sense of order in what looks like disintegration, and tells you what your place is in it. But there is a moral duty, and we need to face up to it. And maybe, just maybe, sometimes the people in charge are just as blinkered as we are.

Sam Kriss, “Liberals on the Edge of a Nervous Breakdown” (Feb. 1, 2017).

posting to emphasize the point that although what’s happening is really, really bad, it is harmful to let ourselves believe that the administration is all-knowing and all-powerful, ingenious masters of strategy. they are not. they have weaknesses and they can be fought. do not give up.

(via enoughtohold)

sashayed:

cumaeansibyl:

sashayed:

”[Denmark] is the only case we know of in which the Nazis met with open native resistance, [and] the result seems to have been that those exposed to it changed their minds. They themselves apparently no longer looked upon the extermination of a whole people as a matter of course. They had met resistance based on principle, and their ‘toughness’ had melted like butter in the sun; they had even been able to show a few timid beginnings of genuine courage.

That the ideal of ‘toughness’…was nothing but a myth of self-deception, concealing a ruthless desire for conformity at any price, was clearly revealed at the Nuremberg Trials, where the defendants accused and betrayed each other and assured the world that they ‘had always been against it’–or claimed, as Eichmann was to do, that their best qualities had been ‘abused’ by their superiors. (In Jerusalem, he accused ‘those in power’ of having abused his ‘obedience.’) …The atmosphere had changed, and although most of them must have known that they were doomed, not a single one of them had the guts to defend the Nazi ideology.”

Hannah Arendt, “Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.”

I want everyone to go read that link about Danish resistance, please, because it’s a very good example of what to emphasize:

  • Economic disruption
  • Independent press
  • Defense of marginalized people by word and deed

Yes, PLEASE read up on Denmark. the link is short & super basic, but gives a solid overview.